Dd dating sites
Sears Tower) with current names (e.g.
Watch DD Ventura at FreeOnes Free sex videos, photo sets and biography. Drilnoth ( T C L ) 21:22, 29 September 2009 (UTC) The numerical dates DD-MM-yyyy and MM-DD-yyyy are already explicitly deprecated by mosnum, precisely because of their obvious ambiguity, so they are not at issue here.Many people opposing are saying that it's unambiguous: why is radioactive dating more accurate than relative dating I have repeatedly confused yyyy-MM-DD for yyyy-DD-MM since my dialect uses DD/MM and not MM/DD. A good compromise would be to use the magic word #dateformat with a default format according to the topic of the article just as we already do for explicit dates in prose. I would be very interested to see (if anyone is capable of doing this a snapshot of footnotes from say 2 years ago, and see how they are "displayed" then, before the autoformatting was turned off. Proposal: to amend, wP:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) as follows: Present text: yyyy-MM-DD style dates are uncommon in English prose, and should not be used within sentences. It may be unambiguous in theory, but this is irrelevant to most of our readers, who are unlikely to know the theory by which it is unambiguous. Rich Farmbrough, 20:04, (UTC). Format and would therefore be picked up by a Reflist?
All DD Ventura videos, pictures and more! Yes, it's straightforward once you know what it is, but most of our readers are not familiar with it because it's extremely uncommon in literature. (The proposal here would then be "Dates like should not be used." or "Dates like and 2/3/1999 should not be used.Thus, "2008-09" unequivocally means "September 2008 while the date range "2008-2009" could be abbreviated "2008/09". The problem is, they don't know what to do if they try to extend the format to dates they've never seen before in that format. If there were a way to without cost avoid the "29 February 2009" error as well, I would of course back that also. Americans can at least tolerate it because the month comes before the day as in mm/dd/yyyy.
Rekonnect Dating - Dating sites UK - No Strings Illicit
Looking at articles, it is clear that the consensus is to use this format. The list goes. This discussion is whether footnotes should speed dating dallas ft worth expressly use a different style than the rest of the article.
Chat Rooms to Meet Bored Lonely Married Women. Jc3s5h ( talk ) 06:35, (UTC) "No one is being told how to do something so we have to do it this way now with no alternative" is such flawed logic, both in a purely academical framework ( False choice ) and on Wikipedia. The idea that we should use yyyy-MM-DD for the benefit of non-English speakers is ridiculous; our entire encyclopedia is next to useless to non-English speakers without a translator which would have no problem with dates.Furthermore, while this or that piece of software might have some ability to tailor date presentation to the reader's locale, on the whole, no provision is made for one computer user to present a date to another computer user and have the date automatically presented. #dateformat is probably the closest thing we're goijng to get to automatic date formatting. Crotalus * 20:55, 30 September 2009 (UTC) Oppose I am sorry dear friend who made me aware of this discussion.
DD Ventura Videos and Photos (7) at FreeOnes
Date autoformatting is controversial, hence the #dateformat magic word is also controversial. Certainly it is not explicitly allowed.
Extra-Marital Dating dating cardiologist sites UK for No Strings Illicit Affairs and Adult Dating. In footnotes as per the wording of the RfC) The yyyy-MM-DD format is very useful behind the scenes (e.g. Thanks to Noisalt's sound reasoning, i'd support spelling out month names in full in footnotes/references (which dating cardiologist are not a limited-space situation to maintain consistency with the dates in the articles they accompany.However, if that discussion happened, perhaps this user would support yyyy-MM (not that it pertains to this discussion in any way). Jc3s5h ( new free dating site usa canada talk ) 19:12, (UTC) The above is not an accurate summary of the discussion. Plus its an ISO standard, widely used in computer software, and lexically sorts correctly.
|Published:||20 Nov 2018, 08:16|